misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
Blog Article
seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
14. While in the light of the position explained over, it can be concluded that a civil servant provides a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be thought of for no fault of his very own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the size of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Case files could also be accessed from the public access terminals inside the clerk’s office with the court where the case was filed.
While there isn't any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds minimal sway. Still, if there is no precedent within the home state, relevant case regulation from another state could possibly be regarded because of the court.
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—would be the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.
The case addresses A selection of issues like, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation with the right to life.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm to your person causes death of this kind of person, both by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is claimed to commit qatl-i-khata.”
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station because of likely health risks and dangers.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses including self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may end in reduced charges or acquittal.
3. Rule of Legislation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of legislation and guaranteeing that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to your Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Growth Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter as being a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) in the Pakistan Constitution delivers primary jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to consider up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah equity follows the law cases Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--